fredag 13 december 2013

Fungerar kolesterolsänkande medicin?






Lyssna på doktor Ralf Sundberg som förklarar kolesterolets roll och funktion i kroppen.

Vad är sant och vad ä falskt? Vilka meningsskiljaktigheter finns det på området.....

LDL HDL  lyssna och lär.
Upplagd av kl. Inga kommentarer:

onsdag 11 december 2013

Bikarbonat och bröstcancer studie på G

Bikarbonat ett omdiskuterat ämne i forskningsvärlden samt inom läkarkåren. Jag blev jätteglad över att hitta detta årsgamla inlägg som berättade att pengar avsatts för studier gällande PH medicin.

Den italienska läkaren, onkologen Dr Tullio Simoncini, som påstår att han kan bota cancer med bikarbonat har fått ordentligt på pälsen och vad jag förstår så har hans legitimation blivit indragen. Bota cancer är det ingen som kan göra, bota cancer är det ingen som får göra, inte i ordets betydelse.....  Rätt eller fel, både ja och nej, eftersom det är kroppen som botar sig själv med eller utan hjälp ifrån utsidan.

Förstår att reaktionerna varit så starka i Italien samt även i Europa eftersom detta användningsområde är lite främmande för dem. Bikarbonat har använts åtminstone i 100 år i USA vid behandling av magkatarr, förkylning och influensa, som rengöringsmedel i kylskåp och mycket mycket annat.


Baking Soda Cancer Studies and pH Medicine

Posted by Dr Sircus on May 2, 2012

University of Arizona Cancer Center member Dr. Mark Pagel will receive a $2 million grant from the National Institutes of Health to study the effectiveness of personalized baking soda cancer treatment for breast cancer. In other words, clinical trials on the use of oral baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) for breast cancer treatments are about to start![1] Obviously there are people in the know who have understood that sodium bicarbonate, that same stuff that can save a person’s life in the emergency room in a heartbeat, is a primary cancer treatment option of the safest and most effective kind.
Of course I feel vindicated for everything I wrote in Sodium Bicarbonate – Rich Man’s Poor Man’s Cancer Treatment, which still stands as the only full medical review on the subject of using simple baking soda in the practice of medicine. When taken orally with water, especially water with high magnesium content, and when used transdermally in medicinal baths, sodium bicarbonate becomes a first-line medicinal for the treatment of cancer, kidney disease, diabetes, influenza and even the common cold. It is also a powerful buffer against radiation exposure, so everyone should be up to speed on its use. Everybody’s physiology is under heavy nuclear attack from strong radioactive winds that are circling the northern hemisphere.
Actually it is no surprise that a University of Arizona researcher received this grant because there has been cancer research going on for years there. Dr. Robert J. Gillies and his colleagues have already demonstrated that pre-treatment of mice with baking soda results in the alkalinization of the area around tumors. The same researchers reported that bicarbonate increases tumor pH and also inhibits spontaneous metastases in mice with breast cancer.[2] It also reduces the rate of lymph node involvement.
I recently published about fungal infections, and breast cancer has been found to be associated with increased frequency of mold-fermented cheese consumption.[3] Fungi produce toxic metabolites called mycotoxins[4] that can cause cancer. Aflatoxin is a mycotoxin with carcinogenic potency that is found in inferior peanut butter and other nut and dairy products. Researchers in 1993 examined human breast cancer tissue and found significant carcinogenic aflatoxin within the cancer tissue implicating aflatoxin and thus fungus as a cause of breast cancer.[5]
The pH level of our internal fluids affects every cell in our body. Chronic over-acidity corrodes body tissue, and if left unchecked will interrupt all cellular activities and functions. In other words, over-acidity interferes with life itself. It is at the root of cancer.
Sodium bicarbonate medical treatments are the time honored method to “speed up” the return of the body’s bicarbonate levels to normal. Sodium bicarbonate happens to be one of our most useful medicines as it treats the basic acid-alkaline axis of human physiology.

Baking Soda and PH Medicine

The pH of our tissues and body fluids is crucial and central because it affects and mirrors the state of our health or our inner cleanliness. The closer the pH is to 7.35-7.45, the higher our level of health and wellbeing. Staying within this range dramatically increases our ability to resist acute illnesses like colds and flues as well as the onset of cancer and other diseases. Keeping our pH within a healthy range also involves necessary lifestyle and dietary changes that will protect us over the long term while the use of sodium bicarbonate gives us a jump-start toward increased alkalinity.
The pH scale is like a thermometer showing increases and decreases in the acid and alkaline content of fluids. Deviations above or below a 7.35-7.45 pH range in the tightly controlled blood can signal potentially serious and dangerous symptoms or states of disease. When the body can no longer effectively neutralize and eliminate the acids, it relocates them within the body’s extra-cellular fluids and connective tissue cells directly compromising cellular integrity. Conversely when the body becomes too alkaline from too much bicarbonate in the blood, metabolic alkalosis occurs, which can lead to severe consequences if not corrected quickly.[6]
Jon Barron presents a way of looking at pH that opens up one of the major benefits of alkaline water:
Hydrogen ions tie up oxygen. That means that the more acid a liquid is, the less available the oxygen in it. Every cell in our body requires oxygen for life and to maintain optimum health. Combine that with what we know about hydrogen ions and we see that the more acid the blood (the lower its pH), the less oxygen is available for use by the cells. Without going into a discussion of the chemistry involved, just understand that it’s the same mechanism involved when acid rain “kills” a lake. The fish literally suffocate to death because the acid in the lake “binds up” all of the available oxygen. It’s not that the oxygen has gone anywhere; it’s just no longer available. Conversely, if you raise the pH of the lake (make it more alkaline), oxygen is now available and the lake comes back to life. Incidentally, it’s worth noting that cancer is related to an acid environment (lack of oxygen)—the higher the pH (the more oxygen present in the cells of the body), the harder it is for cancer to thrive.
Understanding this is important for two reasons: (1) it reveals one of the primary benefits of alkaline water—more “available” oxygen in the system and (2) it explains why alkaline water helps fight cancer.
The ocean, the mother of all life, has an average pH of about 8.1. The ideal pH for blood sits at about 7.4, slightly alkaline—not acidic.- Jon Barron
Barron concludes:
If you’re eating well and living cleanly, then yes, you want to drink water with a naturally occurring pH only slightly above neutral. However, if you are eating the typical Western diet, high in meat, grains, sodas, and sugars that acidify the body, then you have a different problem. Your pH balance is now so far out of normal that you must go beyond normal in the other direction to counter it. My recommendation for daily drinking water pH is about 7.5-8—depending on how acid forming your diet is. Long-term consumption of higher pH water should be reserved for special circumstances. The most famous mountain waters in the world, waters renowned for their healing properties, are highly alkaline. I’m referring to the waters coming down from the Himalayas, and specifically to the waters of the Hunza Valley, which have a pH that runs between 9 and 11.
One does not have to be a doctor to practice pH medicine. Every practitioner of the healing arts and every mother and father needs to understand how to use sodium bicarbonate. Bicarbonate deficiency is a real problem that deepens with age so it really does pay to understand and appreciate what baking soda is all about.
[1] Baking Soda Might Have Potential Against Cancer: http://digitaljournal.com/article/323645
[3] One sample study is by Le, et al. (1986), in a French case-control study of 1,010 breast cancer cases and 1,950 controls with nonmalignant diseases, found that breast cancer was found to be associated with increased frequency of mold fermented cheese consumption.
[4] Going, et al. (1990) found that weddellite (calcium oxalate) crystals are present in calcifications found in the breast tissue of patients with breast cancer. Calcium oxalate crystals are formed when calcium binds with oxalic acid. Oxalic acid is a mycotoxin that can be produced by a number of different fungal species. Some fungi produce such large amounts of oxalic acid that they are used for commercial production of chemicals. Aspergillus niger fungal infection in human lungs produces large amounts of oxalic acid.
[5] Researchers examined human DNA from a variety of tissues and organs to identify and quantify aflatoxin DNA-adducts. Such adducts are considered to be proof of the mycotoxin’s presence in a particular tissue.Their finding? “Tumor tissues had higher aflatoxin-adduct levels than did normal tissue from the same individual.”

Upplagd av kl. 2 kommentarer:

Glutenfri festmåltid

http://thekitchenrag.com/2013/11/thanksgiving-recipe-round.html





Recept samt lite andra hälsosamma tips för den som är intresserad.


Upplagd av kl. Inga kommentarer:

lördag 7 december 2013

Gardsil valet är ditt - skydd i 5 år eller risk för biverkningar.

Är Gardasil rätt för dig eller någon i din familj.
Fakta skall ställa mot de fakta som finns.
Vaccinet ger inte livslångt skydd för en sjukdom som oftast utvecklas senare i livet, det varar i 5 år. Detta skall ställas mot de risker som faktiskt existerar vilka benämns som biverkningar.

Har den svenska regeringen gjort samma avtal som den amerikanska med Merck och vilka summor handlar det om. Skall dessa pengar användas som ersättning till vaccinskadade?






http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/mainstream-media-attacks-katie-couric-for-publishing-truth-on-gardasil-vaccine/


http://katiecouric.com/videos/was-the-hpv-vaccine-responsible-for-one-girls-death/





Mainstream Media Attacks Katie Couric for Publishing Truth on Gardasil Vaccine

Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News Editor
Popular news broadcaster, Katie Couric, interviewed  the mother of a young lady who died after receiving the Gardasil vaccine, as well as one of the lead doctors who conducted clinical trials for Merck, on her day-time talk show, Wednesday, December 4th. She also interviewed another mother and daughter who have been affected by the vaccine. (Videos below)
That a major network allowed something negative about vaccines to be aired is quite rare. If you visit the Katie Couric websiteto read about the show, however, you will find nothing in print that is negative regarding the Gardasil vaccine, but instead you will find an article by a physician recommending the vaccine, as well as links to the CDC, which of course, is pro-vaccine. Even when you watch the videos below, you will see pop-up messages from social media by people supposedly stating they received the vaccine and nothing bad happened to them.
The issues communicated in the show regarding the Gardasil vaccine, which are readily available online and not new, are probably less significant than how the mainstream media responded to the show. Attacks on Katie Couric for talking to a parent of a child who died from vaccine injuries, and a physician who was involved in bringing the vaccine to market, clearly show the mainstream media bias and censorship that still exists regarding vaccines.
Alexandra Sifferlin, writing for Time Magazine, was one of the first to publish a hit piece: Is Katie Couric The Next Jenny McCarthy? A former Playboy Bunny spreading misinformation is bad enough
Here are some excerpts from this Northwestern University Medill School of Journalism graduate:
There is no “HPV Vaccine Controversy.” At least, not when it comes to the injection’s safety. And yet, that was the title of the lead segment on Katie Couric’s daytime talk show, “Katie,” this afternoon.
The bottom line is that there is no scientific evidence that the HPV vaccine causes adverse effects beyond normal vaccine side effects, such as dizziness, nausea, and pain and redness at the injection site.
The damage a former Playboy Bunny has been able to do is bad enough. But Couric’s misdeeds are all the worse given that she’s taken much more seriously than Jenny McCarthy.
Sifferlin’s treatment of the subject is very typical of mainstream media’s coverage of vaccines. The rules of investigative journalism do not apply. For them, it is a closed issue: vaccines are proven to be safe and effective by science, and to suggest otherwise puts one on par with a mass murder.
And that’s almost exactly how Michael Hiltzik of the LA Times described it, taking some time off from defending Obamacare and getting in his hit piece: Katie Couric puts the anti-vaccination movement into the mainstream
The anti-vaccination movement has long since become a public menace. It’s responsible for the resurgence of numerous serious diseases that were on the decline, including measles, mumps, and whooping cough.
Now the movement has been given a big booster shot by Katie Couric, who devoted a large portion of her daily talk show Wednesday to some highly emotional and scientifically dubious claims by critics of Gardasil, a leading vaccine for human papillomavirus, or HPV.
Again, Hiltzik perfectly exemplifies the media bias towards vaccines and that the investigative principles of journalism do not apply:
To be fair, Couric announced at the outset of the segment that she’d had her own two daughters immunized against HPV. The segment also featured a pediatric expert advising that the HPV vaccine is the best tool we have for the early prevention of HPV infection and therefore for safeguarding against its possible consequences, which include cervical cancer in women and other cancers in men.
But those portions of the show had the flavor of “balance,” presented to stave off accusations of pandering to ignorance. The real punch of the show was its portrayal of HPV vaccination as “controversial.” Couric led the segment off by declaring that “some people say the risk (of the vaccine) may outweigh the benefits, and there are claims that it could be dangerous or in a handful of cases, even deadly….We want to keep our kids safe, but is  the vaccine the way to go?”Merely to ask the questions is to validate them. (Emphasis added).
Did you catch that last sentence: “Merely to ask the questions is to validate them.” The topic of vaccines is exempt from regular investigative journalism, and if you ask the wrong questions, expect to be attacked just for asking the question. The public does not deserve such information – journalists know better.
What Time Magazine and the LA Times have in common is that they are part of a dying breed of print media in the new digital age. Unlike syndicated television, print media has seen its revenue from advertisers plummet as they struggle to come up with new economic models to sustain popular news websites, which are expensive to operate. Gone are the days of advertisers purchasing large amounts of ad space in print media where it is very difficult to measure the ROI (return on investment) for advertising dollars. In the new digital era of Internet publishing, ROI can be determined exactly, and advertisers are bailing from many news sites  because traffic does not correlate well to clicks and purchases. Most of these former print media giants of the past are not economically sustainable in the digital era, and one has to wonder if it isn’t mainly Big Pharma and Big Food that is keeping most of them alive for now, as they try to keep the big brands afloat in a rapidly changing consumer market.
So Katie Couric gets attacked for “asking the wrong questions.” Can you imagine what would have happened if she had truly reported the facts regarding Gardasil that are so readily available in countries outside of the U.S., or in the alternative media on the Internet?  It is still very unlikely that her network producers would have allowed such basic facts as these to be broadcast:
How about the fact that Julie Gerberding was in charge of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, which includes the years the FDA approved Gardasil as a vaccine, and then resigned from the CDC on January 20, 2009, and is now the president of Merck’s Vaccine division?
How about the fact that the U.S. government makes royalties from the HPV vaccines? In November 2010, Dr. Eric Suba submitted a Freedom of Information Request to the Office of Government Information Services to discover the amount of money the U.S government earns from Merck’s sale of Gardasil. But apparently the government is immune from revealing those figures, as you can read for yourself the response Dr. Suba received here.
No, the mainstream media is not upset at Katie Couric for covering those facts, because she didn’t. They’re just upset that she asked the wrong questions.

Upplagd av kl. Inga kommentarer:

fredag 6 december 2013

Vaccin och autism ... sanning?

http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/truth-in-media-vaccine-court-and-autism-cover-up-exposed/

Truth in Media: Vaccine Court and Autism

Excerpts:
The claims that autism is caused by vaccines have been completely disproven, right?
But is the claim untrue? What if I told you that while HHS says there is no link between autism and vaccinations, the federal government has quietly awarded families of autistic children damages as a result of vaccine injuries?
The first step toward truth is to be informed.
The story we are talking about today is something that just doesn’t get attention from the mainstream media, and on the rare occasion when it does, the story is predictable. Scandal surrounding a doctor who claims autism and vaccines are linked. The bizarre parents who believe that their child has autism because of a vaccine, a claim clearly not based in science.
But is there more to this story than what the media has told you?
The real story behind vaccines begins in 1986.
That is because it was in 1986 when the U.S. Congress created National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Now that alone is worthy of a story, because what most Americans don’t know is that a family who has child injured by a vaccine, cannot simply sue the vaccine maker. Under this 1986 law, Congress took that power away from families and instead created a “vaccine court” if you will.
The official name, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“VICP”).
In 1986 when the VICP was first created vaccine makers were protected from lawsuit by the public. The VICP insulates vaccine manufacturers from liability and requires that petitioners bring their petitions solely against HHS. They may not sue manufacturers or healthcare practitioners. The rationale for this industry and professional protection was to ensure a stable childhood vaccine supply and to keep prices affordable.
The 1986 Law also permits the vaccine makers the right to not disclose known risks to parents or guardians of those being vaccinated. Based on something called the “learned intermediary” doctrine, manufacturers bear no liability for giving, or failing to give, accurate or complete information to those vaccinated.
So for parents, like Blaxill, why does he believe the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has failed?
That goes back to 2002 when nearly five thousand families filed petitions with the VICP claiming that vaccines had caused their children’s neurological disorder called “autism.”
According to the Pace Law Review, in an unprecedented proceeding, the VICP created and conducted the Omnibus Autism Proceeding that concluded in 2010. That means instead of taking the cases one at at time, they consolidated hearings for all these families. In the end, the VICP dismissed all the “test case” claims of vaccine-induced autism.
But there is more… A Review of Compensated Cases of Vaccine-Induced Brain Injury finds that The VICP has compensated approximately 2,500 claims of vaccine injury since the inception of the program in 1986.
Since that time, despite the official ruling that there is no link between vaccines and autism, there have been at least 83 cases of autism among those compensated for vaccine-induced brain damage.
Upplagd av kl. Inga kommentarer:

onsdag 4 december 2013

HPV vaccin bubblan på väg att spräckas?




The Gardasil and Cervarix ‘cervical cancer’ vaccine bubble is about to burst. Back in August, I told you about a study the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) conducted to assess the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The study included subjects vaccinated with Gardasil (Merck’s vaccine) and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine). The CDC announced the […]

The Gardasil and Cervarix ‘cervical cancer’ vaccine bubble is about to burst. Back in August, I told you about a study the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) conducted to assess the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The study included subjects vaccinated with Gardasil (Merck’s vaccine) and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine).
The CDC announced the good-news results in a press release with this headline… “New study shows HPV vaccine helping lower HPV infection rates in teen girls.” 
Think again
It turns out that the ‘positive’ results of that study were nothing but a well-planned PR exercise to push the sales of these vaccines…
Enter Dr. Diane Harper — the lead researcher in the development of the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix — who recently explained that the cervical cancer risk in the US is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect on the rate of cervical cancer.
Dr. Harper is the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and futility of these vaccines. She made her surprising confession at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia, in the US.
The real kicker (at least for Merck and GSK) is that her speech was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, but she took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”.
When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used… and here’s why:
* 70 per cent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90 per cent in two years.
* All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.
* So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.
* To date, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.
* The reported side effects of these vaccines include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.
These are the facts that the manufactures don’t want you to know about… and they came straight from one of their experts, Dr. Harper — someone who finally wanted to clear her conscience about this poison that is being given to young children.
Sadly (and as expected) there are no front page headlines about Dr. Harper’s confession… Instead, I came across the following article in a mainstream newspaper over the weekend: ‘HPV vaccine could be given to boys as well as girls in UK’.
According to the article, UK government advisers are to consider whether the HPV vaccine should be offered to boys and some men. They are to review whether targeted vaccination would help cut the risk of throat and oral cancers among men, as well as the wider question over whether a universal male vaccination programme given to pre-teen or teenage boys is necessary.
However, these vaccines have not been tested for the prevention of oral and throat cancers. In fact, although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven that “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.”
In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period. So the chances of it actually helping an individual are about the same as the chances of that person being struck by a meteorite.



Upplagd av kl. 2 kommentarer:

Kikhostevaccin och Sverige år 2013, fungerar det och hur?

Äntligen,äntligen talar man öppet om det jag befarat under flera år. Vaccinerade smittar ovaccinerade. Vem är en fara för vem egentligen?



http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=406&artikel=5721557



Kikhosta farligt för småbarn. Foto TT

Den typ av kikhostevaccin som nu används i Sverige verkar skydda mot hosta under några år, men den vaccinerade tycks ändå fortsätta att smitta. Det visar en studie från det amerikanska läkemedelsverket.
Publicerat tisdag 3 december kl 06:00
I Sverige infördes det nya kikhostevaccinet 1996, efter ett uppehåll på 17 år. Men vaccinet skyddar inte helt och hållet. I flera länder, som USA, Storbritannien, Belgien och Australien pågår kikhoste-epidemier,  och för ett par år sen visade det sig att det nya vaccinet bara ger skydd i upp till fem år.
Det amerikanska läkemedelsverket FDA har nu gjort en studie på babianer, som visar att de vaccinerade visserligen får mindre hosta men fortsätter att vara smittsamma under en längre tid.
– Det är ett intressant resultat som tidigare inte har kunnat visats i djur som är så pass lika oss, konstaterar Rigmor Thorstensson på Smittskyddsinstitutet.
Samtidigt är hon lite tveksam till att dra för stora slutsatser av den här studien, resultatet går kanske inte direkt att överföra till människor. Särskilt vad gäller hur lång smittsamheten är, eftersom aporna smittades med 100 ggr så många bakterier.
Spädbarn är de som är känsligast för kikhosta. De kan inte hosta upp allt slem som bildas och kan få svårt att andas. I Sverige drabbas ungefär 40 barn varje år. Framför allt sprids smittan när någon hostar. I Storbritannien har man därför börjat vaccinera gravida, för att så något sätt komma tillrätta med sjukdomsutbrotten. Detta är dock inte aktuellt i Sverige.
– Nej, det är det inte. Vi håller på att titta på vad det skulle kunna betyda. Men vi har inte så väldigt många spädbarn som drabbas av det nu, konstaterar Rigmor Thorstensson.
Annika Östman
annika.ostman@sverigesradio.se


Smittspridning trots kikhostevaccin

En ny studie från det amerikanska läkemedelsverket visar att den typ av kikhostevaccin som används i Sverige verkar skydda mot hosta under några år, men att den vaccinerade tycks fortsätta att smitta.
I Sverige infördes det nya kikhostevaccinet 1996 och ungefär 40 barn drabbas varje år. Spädbarn är de som är känsligast för kikhosta då de har svårt att hosta upp allt slem som bildas och kan få svårt att andas.
I flera länder, bland annat Storbritannien pågår kikhostepidemier. Där har man därför börjat vaccinera gravida, för att så något sätt komma tillrätta med sjukdomsutbrotten. Detta är dock inte aktuellt i Sverige.
– Nej, det är det inte. Vi håller på att titta på vad det skulle kunna betyda. Men vi har inte så väldigt många spädbarn som drabbas av det nu, säger Rigmor Thorstensson på Smittskyddsinstitutet, till Sveriges radio


Upplagd av kl. Inga kommentarer:
Prenumerera på: Inlägg (Atom)