The Gardasil and Cervarix ‘cervical cancer’ vaccine bubble is about to burst. Back in August, I told you about a study the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) conducted to assess the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The study included subjects vaccinated with Gardasil (Merck’s vaccine) and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine). The CDC announced the […]
The Gardasil and Cervarix ‘cervical cancer’ vaccine bubble is about to burst. Back in August, I told you about a study the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) conducted to assess the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The study included subjects vaccinated with Gardasil (Merck’s vaccine) and Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine).
The CDC announced the good-news results in a press release with this headline… “New study shows HPV vaccine helping lower HPV infection rates in teen girls.”
It turns out that the ‘positive’ results of that study were nothing but a well-planned PR exercise to push the sales of these vaccines…
Enter Dr. Diane Harper — the lead researcher in the development of the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix — who recently explained that the cervical cancer risk in the US is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect on the rate of cervical cancer.
Dr. Harper is the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and futility of these vaccines. She made her surprising confession at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia, in the US.
The real kicker (at least for Merck and GSK) is that her speech was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, but she took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”.
When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used… and here’s why:
* 70 per cent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90 per cent in two years.
* All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.
* So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.
* To date, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.
* The reported side effects of these vaccines include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.
These are the facts that the manufactures don’t want you to know about… and they came straight from one of their experts, Dr. Harper — someone who finally wanted to clear her conscience about this poison that is being given to young children.
Sadly (and as expected) there are no front page headlines about Dr. Harper’s confession… Instead, I came across the following article in a mainstream newspaper over the weekend: ‘HPV vaccine could be given to boys as well as girls in UK’.
According to the article, UK government advisers are to consider whether the HPV vaccine should be offered to boys and some men. They are to review whether targeted vaccination would help cut the risk of throat and oral cancers among men, as well as the wider question over whether a universal male vaccination programme given to pre-teen or teenage boys is necessary.
However, these vaccines have not been tested for the prevention of oral and throat cancers. In fact, although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven that “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.”
In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period. So the chances of it actually helping an individual are about the same as the chances of that person being struck by a meteorite.